@JUDGMENTTAG-ORDER
Bhagabati Prasad Banerjee, J.@mdashThe following question of law has been referred to this Court by the Tribunal u/s 256(1) of the income tax
Act, 1961 (''the Act''):
Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the income tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding that the estimate filed by the
assessee on 18-12-1979 was not a valid estimate and therefore, could not be acted upon for imposition of penalty u/s 221(1) of the income tax
Act, 1961?
The assessment year involved in this reference is the assessment year 1980-81 for which the accounting period is ended on 31-12-1979.
2. In the instant case, the assessee was a regular assessee. No notice of demand was served upon the assessee demanding payment of advance
tax. The Tribunal found that the assessee filed the estimate on 18-12-1979 which was dated 6-12- 1978. The estimate was admittedly filed
beyond the time prescribed under the law.
3. The point is already concluded by the judgment in the case of Babulal Newar Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax and Others, . The principles
laid down in that case is that an estimate which was filed beyond time was not a valid estimate and since it was not a valid estimate no interest
could be charged on the basis of such estimate. In the instant case, not only the estimate was an invalid one but there was no demand by the ITO
for payment of advance tax.
4. Therefore, following the principles of law laid down in the aforesaid decision the question is answered in the affirmative and in favour of the
assessee. There will be no order as to costs.
Sen, J. -
I agree.
