Gtpl Hathway Ltd Vs Sahana Films Pvt Ltd

Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal 3 Jun 2022 Broadcasting Petition No. 55 Of 2020 (2022) 06 TDSAT CK 0011
Bench: Division Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Broadcasting Petition No. 55 Of 2020

Hon'ble Bench

D. N. Patel, Chairperson; Subodh Kumar Gupta, Member

Advocates

Nasir Husain, Anasuya Choudhury

Judgement Text

Translate:

1. Counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that an order was passed by this Tribunal dated 27.4.2022, through which a direction was given to

the respondent to make the payment of Rs. 15 lakhs to the petitioner on or before 31.5.2022. It is further submitted that the said order has not been

complied with because of financial difficulties being faced by the respondent and hence, today they have preferred a handwritten application signed by

Advocate for the respondent stating that the respondent shall make payment of Rs. 5 lakhs during the course of the day to the petitioner and remaining

Rs. 10 lakhs will be paid by the respondent to the petitioner within a period of two weeks from today.

2. Counsel for the respondent submits that upon instructions received from (a) Mr. Chandra Mohan, who is the CEO of the respondent and (b) Mr.

Sushil Shetty, who is the Authorised Representative of the respondent, a hand-written application has been preferred for modification of the order

dated 27.4.2022. If there is any breach of the assurance, then action may be taken against the Directors of the respondent as well as against the

aforesaid two persons.

3. On this assurance given by counsel for the respondent through their hand-written application, photocopy of which is taken on record and, therefore,

we hereby modify our order dated 27.4.2022 in the present Broadcasting Petition No. 55 of 2020 to the effect that the respondent shall make

payment of Rs. 5 lakhs to the petitioner within a period of one week from today. The remaining amount of Rs. 10 lakhs will be paid by the

respondent to the petitioner within a further period of three weeks from today.

4. To the aforesaid extent, our order dated 27.4.2022 in the present Broadcasting Petition No. 55 of 2020 is hereby modified.

5. If the respondent does not deposit the said amount in terms of the re-scheduled payment as indicated above, we hereby direct the aforesaid two

persons of the respondent viz. Mr. Chandra Mohan and Mr. Shushil Shetty shall remain personally present before this Tribunal on the next date of

hearing at 11.00 A.M.

6. We also clarify that so far as the further direction for payment of remaining amount of Rs. 8.60 lakhs by the respondent to the petitioner on or

before 7.7.2022 is concerned, that order shall remain as it is.

7. We adjourn the matter to 25.7.2022.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More