Taj Television (india) Pvt. Ltd Vs Home Cable Network Pvt Ltd

Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal 5 Sep 2024 Broadcasting Petition No. 451 Of 2015 (2024) 09 TDSAT CK 0002
Bench: Single Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Broadcasting Petition No. 451 Of 2015

Hon'ble Bench

Sanjeev Pandey, Director

Advocates

Kunal Vats, Rinku Yadav

Judgement Text

Translate:

Rejoinder Affidavit has not yet been filed by Petitioner. Perusal of record indicates that multiple opportunities have been given to Petitioner for filing Rejoinder Affidavit, however, the same is still awaited. On last date, cost was also imposed  for not filing Rejoinder Affidavit by the given time.  Learned Counsel for Petitioner states that he could not  file Rejoinder Affidavit as he has not been receiving any instructions from the client.

Learned Counsel for Respondent prays for closing right of Petitioner to file Rejoinder Affidavit in this matter.

List before Hon'ble Tribunal on a convenient date for appropriate directions.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More