Indiacast Media Distribution Pvt Ltd Vs Sreesaibab Digital High Defination Advanced Network Pvt Ltd

Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal 1 Oct 2024 Broadcasting Petition No. 348 Of 2022 (2024) 10 TDSAT CK 0002
Bench: Single Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Broadcasting Petition No. 348 Of 2022

Hon'ble Bench

Sanjeev Pandey, Director

Advocates

Pranav, Neeraj Kumar Sharma.

Judgement Text

Translate:

Learned Counsel for Respondent seeks further time of three weeks for filing Reply Affidavit stating that the the client resides in Hyderabad and it is difficult to receive the Affidavit from the client. It is informed that cost has since been deposited by Learned Counsel for Respondent.

Prayer is opposed by the Opposite Counsel stating that Hon'ble Tribunal vide order Dated 09.05.2024 had given last accommodation to the Respondent for depositing cost and filing of Reply Affidavit in two weeks time. Learned Counsel, therefore, prays for closing right of Respondent to file Reply Affidavit in this matter.

List before Hon'ble Tribunal for appropriate Directions at a convenient date..     

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More