Balaram Negi And Others Vs Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal (CGIT) Cum Labour Court, Bhubaneswar And Others

Orissa High Court 4 Apr 2023 Writ Petition (C) No. 36644 Of 2021 (2023) 04 OHC CK 0025
Bench: Division Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition (C) No. 36644 Of 2021

Hon'ble Bench

Arindam Sinha, J; S. K. Mishra, J

Advocates

Saswat K. Acharya, Jagruti Sahoo, Shubham Agarwal, Bibhuti Bhusan Swain, Tarun Kanta Pattanayak, Sunil Kumar Swain

Judgement Text

Translate:

WP(C) nos.36644, 19533, 19536, 19538, 37354 and 37355 of 2021

1. Three contractors have individually challenged common award dated 18th December, 2020 passed by Central Government Industrial Tribunal-Cum-Labour Court, Bhubaneswar. Their writ petitions were presented prior to three writ petitions filed by sixteen workmen challenging same award. The Tribunal had directed the contractors to pay Rs.4 lakhs each to the workmen in the reference, in lieu of reinstatement and back wages. There was also direction to pay interest on default. The workmen by their writ petitions have challenged the award on contending that they ought to have been given reinstatement and back wages, the finding that they had achieved age of superannuation being not based on relevant evidence and, therefore, perverse.

2. Mr. Acharya, learned advocate appears on behalf of the contractors (management). He submits, finding that the domestic enquiry was unfair, was made illegally and with material irregularity. As such, the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to venture further for purported determination on claims of the workmen for reinstatement and back wages.

3. Mr. Swain, learned advocate appears on behalf of the workmen and relies on finding in impugned award regarding the preliminary as well as the other issues. On those there should be no interference but, where some workmen had received settlement, the Tribunal acted illegally and with irregularity in directing reinstatement with back wages to his clients, who did not compromise on their principled stand.

4. We have made cursory perusal of impugned award. We do not find reference to any exhibits as tendered in the Tribunal. We note that Mr. Acharya has relied on judgment dated 25th April, 2007 made by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bargarh in Civil Suit no.45 of 2006 (The Associated Cement Companies Limited v. Dungri Khani Mazdoor Sangh and others).

5. The LCR(s) pertaining to impugned award dated 18th December, 2020 in ID case nos.10, 12 and 13 of 2008 be called for urgently. Parties are to come ready to demonstrate tendering of documents as exhibits, for reliance thereon as necessary for the adjudication.

6. List on 13th April, 2023.

…………………………

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More