M/s. Dilip Kumar Nayak Vs Commissioner Of Customs, Excise & Service Tax, Bhubaneswar

Orissa High Court 24 Apr 2023 OTAPL No.12 Of 2017 (2023) 04 OHC CK 0243
Bench: Single Bench
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

OTAPL No.12 Of 2017

Hon'ble Bench

S. Talapatra J; Savitri Ratho, J

Advocates

Amar Kumar Mohanty, T.K. Satapathy,

Acts Referred
  • Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 35G
  • Finance Act, 1994 - Section 73(4)

Judgement Text

Translate:

1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.

2. Heard Mr. Amar Kumar Mohanty, learned counsel appearing for the appellant.

3. This is an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order dated 23.03.2007 delivered by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (in short CESTAT), Kolkata affirming the order of the Commissioner dated 31. 12.2020, Annexure- 3 to the appeal memo.

4. The appeal is admitted for hearing on the following substantial question of law:

Whether the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax as well as the order of affirmation by the CESTAT is sustainable, as it is held that Section-73(4), Chapter-V of the Finance Act, 1994 is applicable to the case of the appellant ?

5. Issue notice.

6. Notice is made returnable on 03.07.2023.

7. Since Mr. T.K. Satapathy, learned Senior Standing Counsel, GST, Central Tax and Customs appears and waives notice for the respondent, no formal notice is called for.

8. One extra copy of the appeal memo shall be served on Mr. Satapathy, learned Senior Standing Counsel by tomorrow.

…………………………….

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More