The Queen Vs Gour Mohan Sen and Another

Calcutta High Court 5 May 1869 (1869) 05 CAL CK 0003

Judgement Snapshot

Judgement Text

Translate:

Norman, J.@mdashAs we understand this case, the prisoner Gour Mohan Sen, Mooktear, applied u/s 50, clause 2 of Act X of 1862, to the Collector for a new stamp in lieu of one supposed to have been spoilt within six months previously. It turned out, on enquiry, that the writing on the stamp had been tampered with for fraudulent purposes, and the prisoners were committed for using a forged document, u/s 471. The Collector, to whom the stamp was tendered, was not sitting as a Court, Civil or Criminal, nor was the document given in evidence in any proceeding in any Court. Section 170 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has no application to the case, and our interference is quite unnecessary, But if section 170 had applied, the Judge would have done well to see if the Collector would not give the necessary sanction before he commenced the trial of the case, instead of sending up the proceedings to us u/s 434. The prisoners must be tried.

From The Blog
Calcutta High Court Quashes EPFO Order Denying Higher Pension to SAIL Staff, Calls It ‘Abuse of Law’
Nov
21
2025

Court News

Calcutta High Court Quashes EPFO Order Denying Higher Pension to SAIL Staff, Calls It ‘Abuse of Law’
Read More
Supreme Court Rejects Quota for Civil Judges in District Judge Promotions, Issues Fresh Rules on Seniority
Nov
21
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Rejects Quota for Civil Judges in District Judge Promotions, Issues Fresh Rules on Seniority
Read More