Hitesh Sood Vs Sandeep Bhatnagar

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh 20 Jul 2020 COPCT No. 722 Of 2020 (2020) 07 SHI CK 0124
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

COPCT No. 722 Of 2020

Hon'ble Bench

Sandeep Sharma, J

Advocates

Sameer Thakur, Ajay Chauhan

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Judgement Text

Translate:

Sandeep Sharma, J

1. Mr. Sameer Thakur, learned counsel representing the petitioner, while fairly submitting that the order/judgment alleged to have been violated has

been complied with partly, contends that one year pension and gratuity still remain to be paid.

2. Mr. Ajay Chauhan, Advocate while accepting notice on behalf of the respondent fairly states that by now aforesaid order/judgment alleged to have

been violated, must have been complied with, but if not, same would be complied with within a period of four weeks from today.

3. Consequently, in view of the aforesaid statement made by learned counsel representing the respondent, this Court sees no reason to keep the

present petition alive and as such, same is accordingly disposed of with the direction to the respondent to release one year pension and gratuity to the

petitioner, within a period of four weeks, failing which, petitioner would be at liberty to get the present proceedings revived, so that appropriate action,

in accordance with law, is taken against erring official. Notice issued to the respondent is hereby discharged accordingly.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More