Chatur Nath And Ors Vs State Of Rajasthan And Ors

Rajasthan High Court 5 Nov 2019 Civil Writ Petition No. 16548 Of 2019 (2019) 11 RAJ CK 0047
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Civil Writ Petition No. 16548 Of 2019

Hon'ble Bench

Dinesh Mehta, J

Advocates

Mahaveer Prasad Pareek, Sunil Beniwal

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred
  • Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 - Section 101

Judgement Text

Translate:

By way of the present writ petition, the petitioners have challenged the recommendation of the Collector, which was sent in furtherance of the

recommendation dated 3.9.2019 made by the SDO. The contentious recommendation is reproduced hereinfra:

“

, , , ,

â€​

The facts in brief for the present purposes are that the State Government issued a proposal dated 12.7.2019, whereby a new Gram Panchayat Saredi

was proposed to be constituted, comprising of village Saredi, Gundali Kheda, Saredi Ka Kheda, Bawarlon Ka Kheda, Ganeshpura, Thikariya Kheda,

Mohanpura and Ralayata.

In response to the proposal so made, the petitioners and other villagers/persons concerned filed their objections.

After considering the objections, the District Collector has however proposed Barawalo Ka Kheda as a new Gram Panchayat instead of Gram

Panchayat ‘Saredi’.

Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the District Collector was not justified in making recommendation of creation of new Gram Panchayat

in the name of ‘Gram Panchayat Barawalo Ka Kheda’, as the objections were invited in relation to the proposal of creation of new Gram

Panchayat ‘Saredi’. Learned counsel relied upon the judgment dated 22.10.2019 rendered in the case of Jabbar Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Raj

& Ors. (SBCWP NO.14359/2019) and argued that the recommendation made by the District Collector is per-se illegal, inasmuch as the

recommendation cannot be made for creation of a Gram Panchayat, which was not at all proposed in the original notification inviting objections.

Mr. Beniwal, learned AAG supporting the decision of the respondents contended that the decision to create new Gram Panchayat in the name of

Barawalo Ka Kheda has been taken keeping in view the convenience of the villagers and geographical condition of the village Barawalo Ka Kheda.

Having considered the submissions made by the rival parties at bar, this Court has no hesitation in holding that impugned recommendation made by the

District Collector is per -se arbitrary and contrary to law. In an exercise to be undertaken under Section 101 of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, the

District Collector cannot make a recommendation of an altogether new Gram Panchayat, which was not envisioned in the initial notification inviting

objections.

Indisputably, at the time of issuance of notification dated 12.7.2019, Gram Panchayat ‘Saredi’ was proposed to be a new Gram Panchayat,

whereas the District Collector has recommended new Gram Panchayat at ‘Barawalo Ka Kheda’.

In view of the clear statutory provisions, this writ petition is allowed. The recommendation made by the District Collector recommending new Gram

Panchayat ‘Barawalo Ka Kheda’ is quashed and set aside.

Needless to observe that the State Government will be free to constitute Gram Panchayat ‘Saredi’ or introduce a new proposal for creation of

new Gram Panchayat for these villages, in accordance with law.

The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More