Jagjeet Singh @ Jeet Vs State Of Rajasthan And Others

Rajasthan High Court 19 Oct 2023 Criminal Appeal (SB) No. 2175 Of 2023 (2023) 10 RAJ CK 0090
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Appeal (SB) No. 2175 Of 2023

Hon'ble Bench

Manoj Kumar Garg, J

Advocates

Bhoop Singh Choudhary, S.K. Bhati, J.K. Suthar, Sangeeta Mittal

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred

Scheduled Caste And Scheduled Tribe (Prevention Of Atrocities) Act, 1989 — Section 3(1)(S), 3(2)(V), 14A#Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 302, 307, 323#Arms Act, 1959 — Section 3, 25, 27#Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439

Judgement Text

Translate:

Manoj Kumar Garg, J

Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the respondent No.2 and perused the material available on record.

The instant second criminal appeal has been filed under Section 14A of SC/ST Act on behalf of the appellant, who is in custody in connection with

FIR No.311/2020, Police Station Tibbi, District Hanumangarh for the offences under Sections 302, 307, 323, 34 IPC and Sections 3/25 and 27 of Arms

Act and Sections 3(1)(S) and 3(2)(V) of SC/ST Act and against the order dated 21.08.2023 passed by learned Special Judge SC/ST (Prevention of

Atrocity Cases), Hanumangarh whereby the bail application preferred under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the appellant was rejected. The first

appeal was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 12.05.2022 with liberty to file afresh after recording the statement of injured witnesses Lovedeep

Singh @ Lavi and Angrej Singh.

It has been submitted on behalf of the appellant that now Lovedeep @ Lavi has been examined as PW-1 and he declared hostile and other witness

Angrej Singh has not turn up for his evidence before the trial Court. Counsel further submits that co-accused in this case have already been enlarged

on bail by this Court as well as by the learned trial Court. The accused-appellant is in judicial custody since 30.09.2020 and the trial of the case will

take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-appellant.

Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the respondent No.2 have opposed the prayer for bail and submit that the specific allegation has been

levelled against the appellant.

Having regard to the entirety of facts and circumstances as available on record and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced at the bar, this

Court is of the opinion that the order rejecting the application for bail filed on behalf of the appellant, cannot be sustained and deserves to be set aside.

Consequently, the instant second criminal appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated 21.08.2023 passed by learned Special Judge SC/ST

(Prevention of Atrocity Cases), Hanumangarh is set aside. It is ordered that the accused-appellant Jagjeet Singh @ Jeet S/o Gurdev Singh arrested in

connection with FIR No.311/2020, Police Station Tibbi, District Hanumangarh shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of

Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties bond of Rs.50,000/- to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that court on all

dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Rejects NALSA Appeal Filed Sans Convict Consent
Oct
30
2025

Story

Supreme Court Rejects NALSA Appeal Filed Sans Convict Consent
Read More
Supreme Court Raps Insurers for Technical Appeals in Claims
Oct
30
2025

Story

Supreme Court Raps Insurers for Technical Appeals in Claims
Read More