In Re: Cognizance For Extension Of Limitation. Vs

Supreme Court Of India 8 Mar 2021 Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 Of 2020 (2021) 03 SC CK 0029
Bench: Full Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 Of 2020

Hon'ble Bench

Sharad Arvind Bobde, CJ; L. Nageswara Rao, J; S. Ravindra Bhat, J

Advocates

K K Venugopal, Tushar Mehta, Kanu Agrawal, Ankur Talwar, B.V. Balram Das, Arvind Kumar Sharma, A. Lakshminarayanan, Ranjan Mukherjee, Sidharth Luthra, Varun K Chopra, Arshdeep Singh Khurana, Akshat Gupta, Gurtejpal Singh, Rajshree Sharma, Apoorv Kurup, Nidhi Mittal, B. Krishna Prasad, Suchita Dixit, Anilendra Pandey, Madhusudan, Sandeep, Ashwani Kumar, Abhimanyu Tewari, Riddhi Sancheti, Ramesh Babu M. R., Saurabh Mishra, Arjun Garg, Shrutika Garg, Garima Prashad, Archana Sahadeva, Binu Tamta, Krishnanand Pandeya, V. N. Raghupathy, P. H. Parekh, Sr. Sameer Parekh, Kshatrashal Raj, Tanya Chaudhry, Pratyusha Priyadarshini, Nitika Pandey, Soumya Chakraborty, Sanjai Kumar Pathak, Arvind Kumar Tripathi, Shashi Pathak, S. Thananjayan, Mayank Kshirsagar, Apoorv Shukla, Aruna Mathur, Avneesh Arputham, Divyakant Lahoti, Parikshit Ahuja, Praveena Bisht, Vindhya Mehra, Madhur Jhavar, Kartik Lahoti, Rahul Maheshwari, Shivangi Malhotra, Jaigopal Saboo, Mukul Kumar, B. V. Balaram Das, Anannya Ghosh, Aniruddha P. Mayee, Vivek Narayan Sharma, Pranaya Goyal, Nikhil Ranjan, Utkarsh Kulvi, Pranav Saigal, Radhika Gautam, Sarvam Ritam Khare

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Acts Referred
  • Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 23(4), 29A
  • Commercial Courts Act, 2015 - Section 12A
  • Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Section 138(b), 138(c)

Judgement Text

Translate:

1. Due to the onset of COVID-19 pandemic, this Court took suo motu cognizance of the situation arising from difficulties that might be faced by the

litigants across the country in filing petitions/applications/suits/appeals/all other proceedings within the period of limitation prescribed under the general

law of limitation or under any special laws (both Central or State). By an order dated 27.03.2020 this Court extended the period of limitation

prescribed under the general law or special laws whether compoundable or not with effect from 15.03.2020 till further orders. The order dated

15.03.2020 was extended from time to time. Though, we have not seen the end of the pandemic, there is considerable improvement. The lockdown

has been lifted and the country is returning to normalcy. Almost all the Courts and Tribunals are functioning either physically or by virtual mode. We

are of the opinion that the order dated 15.03.2020 has served its purpose and in view of the changing scenario relating to the pandemic, the extension

of limitation should come to an end.

2. We have considered the suggestions of the learned Attorney General for India regarding the future course of action. We deem it appropriate to

issue the following directions: -

1. In computing the period of limitation for any suit, appeal, application or proceeding, the period from 15.03.2020 till 14.03.2021 shall stand excluded.

Consequently, the balance period of limitation remaining as on 15.03.2020, if any, shall become available with effect from 15.03.2021.

2. In cases where the limitation would have expired during the period between 15.03.2020 till 14.03.2021, notwithstanding the actual balance period of

limitation remaining, all persons shall have a limitation period of 90 days from 15.03.2021. In the event the actual balance period of limitation remaining,

with effect from 15.03.2021, is greater than 90 days, that longer period shall apply.

3. The period from 15.03.2020 till 14.03.2021 shall also stand excluded in computing the periods prescribed under Sections 23 (4) and 29A of the

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and provisos (b) and (c) of Section 138 of the Negotiable

Instruments Act, 1881 and any other laws, which prescribe period(s) of limitation for instituting proceedings, outer limits (within which the court or

tribunal can condone delay) and termination of proceedings.

4. The Government of India shall amend the guidelines for containment zones, to state.

“Regulated movement will be allowed for medical emergencies, provision of essential goods and services, and other necessary functions, such as,

time bound applications, including for legal purposes, and educational and job-related requirements.â€​

3. The Suo Motu Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More