Dharani Kanta Lahiry Chowdhury Vs Girija Kanta Lahiry Chowdhury

Calcutta High Court 29 Jan 1904 Rev. No. 1004 of 1903 (1904) 01 CAL CK 0003

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Rev. No. 1004 of 1903

Judgement Text

Translate:

1. We have heard learned counsel on both sides in the matter of this rule. It seems to us that, as matters stand at present, the properties must be treated as joint properties of the two parties concerned. The Civil Court, where the suit for partition is now pending, has declared that the said properties are joint properties and ordered partition being effected ; and it is obvious that, until that jointness is disturbed by actual partition in the suit the properties must be treated as having been declared by the Civil Court to be joint properties. That being so, we are of opinion that no order such as is contemplated by sec. 145, Cr. P. C., can be made in this case. The rule will accordingly be made absolute so as to set aside that order.

From The Blog
J&K High Court: Dealer and Manufacturer Jointly Liable for Car Defects Reported Within Warranty Period
Dec
08
2025

Court News

J&K High Court: Dealer and Manufacturer Jointly Liable for Car Defects Reported Within Warranty Period
Read More
ITAT Ahmedabad: Assessment Order Invalid Without DVO Report, Property Valuation Additions Quashed
Dec
08
2025

Court News

ITAT Ahmedabad: Assessment Order Invalid Without DVO Report, Property Valuation Additions Quashed
Read More