Sri A. Al. Ramasamy Vs The Income Tax Officer

Madras High Court 26 Jul 2011 Tax Case (Appeal) No. 297 of 2005 (2011) 07 MAD CK 0197
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Tax Case (Appeal) No. 297 of 2005

Hon'ble Bench

M. Jaichandren, J; Chitra Venkataraman, J

Advocates

R.Venkatanarayanan, for Subbaraya Aiyer, for the Appellant; J. Naresh Kumar, for the Respondent

Final Decision

Allowed

Judgement Text

Translate:

Chitra Venkataraman, J.@mdashBoth the counsels agree that the questions raised in the tax appeal at the instance of the Assessee is covered by the decision of 2 this Court reported in AR. Alagappa Chettiar v. Income Tax Officer (2004 Volume 267 ITR 749), as well as the decision in T.C. No. 748 of 004, dated 6.7.2011.

2. The question of law raised herein relating to the assessment year 1991-1992, reads as follows:

Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was right in directing that for the purpose of computing the consideration received for transfer of shares in Consolidated Coffee Ltd., the market value of shares of Tata Tea Limited allotted to the Assessee should be adopted instead of the value of the said allotted shares shown as paid up in the books of account of Tata Tea Ltd.

3. In the light of the above said decision, we have No. hesitation in allowing the appeal. The Tax Case appeal is allowed. No. costs.

From The Blog
Delhi HC Frozen Semen Case: Govt Challenges Order Allowing Parents to Inherit Dead Son’s Gametes, Legal Vacuum in Indian Law Exposed
Feb
02
2026

Court News

Delhi HC Frozen Semen Case: Govt Challenges Order Allowing Parents to Inherit Dead Son’s Gametes, Legal Vacuum in Indian Law Exposed
Read More
Budget 2026: New Tax Rules for Sovereign Gold Bonds Limit Exemption to Original Buyers Holding till Maturity
Feb
02
2026

Court News

Budget 2026: New Tax Rules for Sovereign Gold Bonds Limit Exemption to Original Buyers Holding till Maturity
Read More