T. Panchavarnam Vs Regional Transport Authority and Another

Madras High Court 1 Mar 2005 (2005) 03 MAD CK 0103
Bench: Division Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Hon'ble Bench

Markandey Katju, C.J; D. Murugesan, J

Judgement Text

Translate:

Markandey Katju, C.J.@mdashThis writ appeal has been filed against the impugned order of the learned. Single Judge dated 1.4.2004 in Writ Petition No. 8729 of 2004.

2. Heard the learned Counsel for the appellant.

3. The writ petition was filed against the impugned order of the Regional Transport Authority, Dindigul dated 27.12.2003.

4. Every order of the Regional Transport Authority is appealable/revisable under Sections 89/90 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 before the State Transport Appellate Tribunal. Hence the writ petition was liable to be dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy. The writ appeal is consequently dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy W.A.M.R No. 736 of 2005 is dismissed.

From The Blog
Supreme Court: No Formal Demand Notice Needed for Industrial Disputes; Sham Contract Allegations Must Be Heard
Jan
30
2026

Court News

Supreme Court: No Formal Demand Notice Needed for Industrial Disputes; Sham Contract Allegations Must Be Heard
Read More
Supreme Court Orders Inclusion of 49 HIMSR PG Seats in NEET-PG Counselling 2025–26
Jan
30
2026

Court News

Supreme Court Orders Inclusion of 49 HIMSR PG Seats in NEET-PG Counselling 2025–26
Read More