T. Panchavarnam Vs Regional Transport Authority and Another

Madras High Court 1 Mar 2005 (2005) 03 MAD CK 0103
Bench: Division Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Hon'ble Bench

Markandey Katju, C.J; D. Murugesan, J

Judgement Text

Translate:

Markandey Katju, C.J.@mdashThis writ appeal has been filed against the impugned order of the learned. Single Judge dated 1.4.2004 in Writ Petition No. 8729 of 2004.

2. Heard the learned Counsel for the appellant.

3. The writ petition was filed against the impugned order of the Regional Transport Authority, Dindigul dated 27.12.2003.

4. Every order of the Regional Transport Authority is appealable/revisable under Sections 89/90 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 before the State Transport Appellate Tribunal. Hence the writ petition was liable to be dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy. The writ appeal is consequently dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy W.A.M.R No. 736 of 2005 is dismissed.

From The Blog
Delhi High Court: Forcing Accused to Cross-Examine Without Lawyer Vitiates Trial, Violates Fair Justice
Jan
23
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court: Forcing Accused to Cross-Examine Without Lawyer Vitiates Trial, Violates Fair Justice
Read More
Punjab & Haryana High Court: Wife Concealing Income Not Entitled to Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC
Jan
23
2026

Court News

Punjab & Haryana High Court: Wife Concealing Income Not Entitled to Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC
Read More