Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Thakurdas Choithram

Madras High Court 13 Aug 2002 T.C. No. 815 of 1994 (2002) 08 MAD CK 0203
Bench: Division Bench
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

T.C. No. 815 of 1994

Hon'ble Bench

R. Jayasimha Babu, J; K.P. Sivasubramaniam, J

Advocates

T.C.A. Ramanujam, for the Appellant;

Acts Referred
  • Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Rule 5
  • Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 32

Judgement Text

Translate:

R. Jayasimha Babu, J.@mdashThe question referred to us is,

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the provisions of the amended Rule 5 which came into force on April 1, 1983, would be applicable to the assessment year 1983-84 also and the assessee would be entitled to the enhanced depreciation as provided in the said amended rules ?"

2. The assessment year is 1983-84.

3. It is well settled now that the law to be applied for the purpose of assessment is the law in force as on the first day of the assessment year. An amendment or modification subsequently made but which is not given retrospective effect will not affect the law to be applied and will not be applicable for that year''s assessment proceedings.

4. The depreciation on plant and machinery which was revised with effect from April 2, 1983, therefore, will not affect the applicability of the rates which prevailed as on April 1, 1983, for the assessment year 1983-84. The amendment would be applicable only for the subsequent assessment year.

5. The question referred to us is, therefore, answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.

From The Blog
Bombay High Court Affirms Wife’s Right to Maintenance Under Hindu Marriage Act, Even While Living in Matrimonial Home
Nov
20
2025

Court News

Bombay High Court Affirms Wife’s Right to Maintenance Under Hindu Marriage Act, Even While Living in Matrimonial Home
Read More
ITAT Rules Capital Gains Must Reflect Real Sale Value, Quashes Section 263 Revision Orders
Nov
20
2025

Court News

ITAT Rules Capital Gains Must Reflect Real Sale Value, Quashes Section 263 Revision Orders
Read More