K. Arumuga Mudaliar and Co. Vs Registrar, Tamil Nadu Taxation Special Tribunal and Another

Madras High Court 12 Aug 2002 Writ Petition No. 23261 of 2002 and W.M.P. No. 32064 of 2002 (2002) 08 MAD CK 0204
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition No. 23261 of 2002 and W.M.P. No. 32064 of 2002

Hon'ble Bench

R. Jayasimha Babu, J; K.P. Sivasubramaniam, J

Advocates

R. Mahadevan, for the Appellant; T. Ayyasamy, Special Government Pleader (Taxes), for the Respondent

Final Decision

Allowed

Judgement Text

Translate:

@JUDGMENTTAG-ORDER

R. Jayasimha Babu, J.@mdashAt the stage of admission, we have heard the learned Special Government Pleader (Taxes).

2. It is pointed out that the relevant entry "pens" in entry No. 65(1) in Part B of the Third Schedule to the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, includes--according to the clarification issued by the Commissioner which clarification is binding on all his subordinates including assessing officers--"sketch pens" also. The assessment year is 1996-97.

3. The assessee is admittedly a manufacturer of sketch pens. Though the assessee had contended before the Taxation Special Tribunal that the levy of tax on the turnover relevant to "sketch pens" was not taxable, the Tribunal has without adverting to that aspect merely set aside the penalty, and has not said anything at all about the taxability of the item.

4. Learned Special Government Advocate (Taxes) fairly states that the clarification in fact, has been issued by the Commissioner stating that "pens" include "sketch pens". The exemption granted to "pens" therefore, is available in respect of sketch pens as well.

5. It is well-settled that clarifications and orders issued by the Commissioner in terms of the power vested in him under the statute are binding on his subordinates, especially where the orders or instructions are favourable to the assessee.

6. The impugned order of the Tribunal which upheld the assessment with regard to the turnover relating to "sketch pens" therefore, cannot be sustained. The same is set aside. The writ petition is. allowed. Consequently, W.M.P. No. 32064 of 2002 is closed.

From The Blog
Quick Checklist: Start a Company in the USA from India
Nov
09
2025

Court News

Quick Checklist: Start a Company in the USA from India
Read More
Supreme Court: Release Deed Ends Coparcener Rights in Joint Family Property; Unregistered Settlements Valid to Show Severance
Nov
09
2025

Court News

Supreme Court: Release Deed Ends Coparcener Rights in Joint Family Property; Unregistered Settlements Valid to Show Severance
Read More