CWT Vs Mrs. Irmgard Velagapudi

Madras High Court 12 Aug 2002 Tax Case No''s. 876 to 878 of 1992 12 August 2002 (2002) 08 MAD CK 0129
Bench: Full Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Tax Case No''s. 876 to 878 of 1992 12 August 2002

Hon'ble Bench

R. Jayasimha Babu, J; K.P. Sivasubramaniam, J

Advocates

T.C.A. Ramanujam, for the Revenue Uttam Reddy, for the Assessee, for the Appellant;

Judgement Text

Translate:

@JUDGMENTTAG-ORDER

R. Jayasimha Babu, J.

The matter in issue is with regard to valuation of shares in a private company. The Tribunal rendered its decision at a time when it did not have the benefit of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Bharat Hari Singhania and others Vs. Commissioner of Wealth Tax (Central) and others, , in which it was held that rule 1D of the Wealth Tax Rules, 1957 is the sole basis for determining the value of such shares.

2. As the order of the Tribunal is not consistent with the law laid down by the Supreme Court, the order of the Tribunal cannot be sustained. The valuation made by it is required to be modified to the extent required and to be in conformity with the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Bharat Hari Singhania (supra).

3. We, therefore, remit the matter back to the Tribunal to redo the valuation in accordance with rule 1D.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More