MRINALINI W/O.RAMAKRISHNAN & ANR. Vs STATE OF KERALA & ORS.

High Court Of Kerala 16 Jan 2018 4896 of 2015 (2018) 01 KL CK 0054
Bench: Single Bench
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

4896 of 2015

Hon'ble Bench

B.Kemal Pasha

Advocates

K.P.SATHEESAN, P.MOHANDAS, ANOOP.V.NAIR, RAJESH NAIR, BIJOY CHANDRAN, K.S.HARIHARAN NAIR

Acts Referred
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420 - Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property
  • Kerala Money-Lenders Act, 1958, Section 17, Sectoi

Judgement Text

Translate:

1. Petitioners are the accused in C.C.No.188/2015 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate''s Court-I, Kodungallur, which has arisen from Annexure

A1 final report in Crime No.1664/2014 of the Valappad Police Station, for the offences punishable under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code

and Sections 17 and 18A of the Kerala Money Lenders Act.

2. The allegation against the petitioners is that they had lent money to CW1 and to one Ajaya Kumar, who is the husband of CW2 and the friend

of CW1 for exorbitant interest, on obtaining the title deeds of their properties, blank signed stamp papers, blank signed cheque leaves and blank

signed white papers. It is alleged that even after the repayment of the entire amount with interest by CW1, the title deeds and blank signed stamp

papers, blank signed cheque leaves and blank signed white papers, from CW1 have not been returned.

3. According to the petitioners, they had no transaction at all with CW1 and no amount is due to them from CW1. It has been undertaken by the

learned counsel for the petitioners that they do not want to take any steps against CW1 for the recovery of any money and they have never

obtained any blank signed cheque leaves or title deeds or stamp papers from CW1. According to the petitioners, an agreement for sale was

executed by one Ajaya Kumar in favour of the petitioners after obtaining part of consideration and thereafter the said Ajaya Kumar did not care to

execute the sale deed. In the mean time, Ajaya Kumar died and presently the petitioners had filed a civil suit O.S.No.1749/2015 before the

Munsiff''s Court, Chavakkad for specific performance of the agreement executed by the said Ajaya Kumar.

4. On going through the facts contained in Annexure I, it has come out that no such documents have been seized from the possession of the

petitioners. The mere fact that the petitioners had entered into an agreement for sale with one Ajaya Kumar cannot be made use of for styling the

petitioners as money lenders. Even if any amount is lent to CW1, that single money transaction alone will not invite prosecution for the offence

under the Kerala Money Lenders Act. Matters being so, there is absolutely nothing to bring out an offence under Section 420 IPC or any of the

offence under Sections 17 and 18A of the Kerala Money Lenders Act, as against the petitioners. Therefore, all further proceedings in

C.C.No.188/2015 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate''s Court-I, Kodungallur, which has arisen pursuant to Annexure I final report in Crime

No.1664/2014 of the Valappad Police Station, as against the petitioners, can be quashed.

5. In the result, this Crl.M.C. is allowed and all further proceedings in C.C.No.188/2015 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate''s Court-I,

Kodungallur, which has arisen pursuant to Annexure I final report in Crime No.1664/2014 of the Valappad Police Station, as against the

petitioners, are hereby quashed.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More