Commissioner of Income Tax-I Vs Premier Polytronics Ltd.

Madras High Court 12 Jul 2011 Tax Case (Appeal) No. 1082 of 2004 (2011) 07 MAD CK 0297
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Tax Case (Appeal) No. 1082 of 2004

Hon'ble Bench

M. jaichandren, J; Chitra venkataraman, J

Advocates

K. Suresh Kumar and J. Naresh Kumar, for the Appellant; R. Venkatanarayanan Advocate, for the Respondent

Final Decision

Allowed

Judgement Text

Translate:

Chitra Venkataraman, J.@mdashFollowing are the substantial questions of law raised by the Assessee in respect of the assessment year 1994-1995:

1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the sales tax and excise duty have to be excluded from the total turnover while working out the deduction u/s 80HHC in relation to export profits?

2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that deduction u/s 80HHC has to be worked out without deducting carried forward loss from earlier years against the profits of the current year disregarding the provisions of Section 80AB and 80B(5)?

2. Both the parties agree that the issues are covered by the decision of the Apex Court. As far as the first issue is concerned, it is answered in favour of the Assessee in view of the decision reported in Commissioner of Income Tax, Coimbatore Vs. Lakshmi Machine Works, The second issue is answered against the Assessee, in view of the decision reported in Aswini Gold Storage Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax 2007 (290) ITR 183 (Mad.).

3. Thus, while answering the first issue in favour of the Assessee, the second issue stands answered against the Assessee. The Tax Case Appeal is partly allowed. No. costs.

From The Blog
Delhi High Court Declares Electricity a Fundamental Right Under Article 21
Dec
19
2025

Court News

Delhi High Court Declares Electricity a Fundamental Right Under Article 21
Read More
Bombay High Court Rules: Property Inherited by Son Under Section 8 is Separate, Not Ancestral
Dec
19
2025

Court News

Bombay High Court Rules: Property Inherited by Son Under Section 8 is Separate, Not Ancestral
Read More