Aneesh T.A Vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala 16 Dec 2020 Bail Application No. 7781 Of 2020 (2020) 12 KL CK 0266
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Bail Application No. 7781 Of 2020

Hon'ble Bench

Ashok Menon, J

Advocates

S. Renjith, C.N. Prabhakaran

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Acts Referred
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 294(b), 308, 326, 341

Judgement Text

Translate:

1. The applicant is the accused in Crime No.1104 of 2020 of Kunnathunad Police Station, Ernakulam, for having allegedly committed offences

punishable under Sections 294(b), 341, 326 and 308 of the IPC. The prosecution case, in brief, is this:

2. On 25.10.2020, at about 6.00PM, the defacto complainant was allegedly restrained by the accused in front of his house and thereafter he hurled

abuses at him and attacked him by means of a dangerous weapon like a sickle and caused grievous hurt which could even have proved fatal. And,

thus committed the offence. The injury that was sustained by the defacto complainant is a cut injury on the lip exposing the bone. The left palm of the

defacto complainant was almost severed and the vein was cut and he bled profusely. That injury could have proved fatal also. The applicant states

that the allegations are not true. The defacto complainant is a notorious criminal and because of his involvement in several criminal affairs, he must

have got injured in some other way and the applicant is not responsible for that. It is also stated that the applicant and the defacto complainant are

relatives and neighbours residing nearby.

3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicant and the learned Public Prosecutor. The learned Public Prosecutor submits that considering

the injuries sustained to the defacto complainant and the fact that the weapon has yet to be recovered, the applicant is not entitled to anticipatory bail.

4. On hearing the submissions made on either side, I find that the applicant has inflicted very grave injuries on the defacto complainant. Even though it

is stated by the applicant that he too had sustained some injuries for which he has produced a medical record, those injuries are not very grave. And,

moreover, the weapon will have to be recovered.

The application is therefore dismissed with a direction to the applicant to surrender before the Investigating Officer within two weeks. In the event of

his being arrested, after interrogation and recovery, he shall be produced before the jurisdictional court at the earliest, where he is at liberty to apply

for a regular bail which shall be preferably considered and disposed of on the very same date.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More