M.R. Khapali Vs The Principal Secretary, Union Ministry for Law and Justice and Others

Madras High Court 16 Dec 2013 Writ Petition No. 14557 of 2013 (2013) 12 MAD CK 0106
Bench: Division Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition No. 14557 of 2013

Hon'ble Bench

Rajesh Kumar Agrawal, C.J; K. Ravichandrabaabu, J

Judgement Text

Translate:

@JUDGMENTTAG-ORDER

Rajesh Kumar Agrawal, C.J. and K. Ravichandrabaabu, J.@mdashThis writ petition is filed as a Public Interest Litigation. The petitioner is a practising Advocate of this Court. He is seeking for a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 herein to provide infrastructure like diesel generators, solar panels, diesel for existing gensets, photo copies and fill up the staff requirements to all the Subordinate Courts, after receiving a detailed infrastructure details from the courts with the assistance of the Bar Association. It is contended by the petitioner that the Subordinate Courts are functioning in a cramped space without back up power supply. There is no provision for well equipped Judge''s library and no separate staff room with waiting halls for the litigants are available. He has cited the District Munsif Court at Thiruvallur as instance. He complains that the copier machine is not properly functioning in the Subordinate Courts. He further states that the Central Government has been implementing centrally sponsored scheme for the development of infrastructural facilities for the judiciary by way of matching grant from the year 1993-1994 onwards. Thus, he filed the above writ petition praying for infrastructural facilities in the Subordinate Courts in the State of Tamilnadu.

2. The second respondent filed a counter affidavit wherein the details of Courts which are functioning in the rented buildings are given in Annexure-I. The details of the courts with buildings where the infrastructure is insufficient and repairs are needed are given in Annexure-II. The list of Courts where Gensets, Xerox machines and staffs are in need are given in Annexure-III.

3. A perusal of those Annexures filed along with the counter affidavit would show that no proposal is pending with the Government in respect of the most of the Courts where certain infrastructure and repairs are required. Same is the position in respect of requirement of gensets, xerox machines and staff, etc.

4. Thus we are of the view that before taking any judicial decision, it is better that the matter be placed before the Administrative side of this Court, viz., the Building Committee for Subordinate Courts and to seek its view and report on the present issue. Since the Building Committee of this Court constituted for the Subordinate Courts is to play a role in respect of the issue involved in this writ petition, we would like to get the report from the said Committee so that a just and proper judicial decision could be taken in this matter. Accordingly, the Registry is directed to place the copy of the relevant pleadings in this writ petition before the Building Committee for the Subordinate Courts and get a report from the said Committee preferably within a period of six weeks from today. Post this writ petition after obtaining the report from the Building Committee.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Questions Multiplex Food Prices: “₹100 for Water, ₹700 for Coffee”
Nov
05
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Questions Multiplex Food Prices: “₹100 for Water, ₹700 for Coffee”
Read More
Delhi High Court Upholds Landlord Heirs’ Rights, Orders Eviction of Sub-Tenants in Ownership Dispute
Nov
05
2025

Court News

Delhi High Court Upholds Landlord Heirs’ Rights, Orders Eviction of Sub-Tenants in Ownership Dispute
Read More