@JUDGMENTTAG-ORDER
M. Sathyanarayanan, J.@mdashHeard the submissions of Mr. Kandhan Duraisami, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. K. Ravindranath, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 1st respondent, Mr. R. Shivakumar, learned Counsel for 2nd and 3rd respondents and Mr. K.H. Ravikumar, learned Counsel for the 4th respondent. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 1st respondent today produced the communication of the Southern Regional Office of 1st Respondent -All India Council for Technical Education, Chennai in F. No. 90 1042/2009/7811 dated 28.10.2010 addressed to the standing counsel for 1st Respondent, which reads as follows:
F. No. 90-1042/2009/7811 28 October 2010
To
Shri K. Ravindranath
Addl. Standing Counsel,
115, New Law Chambers,
High Court Buildings
Chennai 600 104.
Sub: W.P. No. 24436/2009 - filed by Nandha Engineering College, Erode-regarding.
Sir,
I am to refer to your letter dated 23.10.2010 on the above noted subject and tostate that considering the interest of thestudents, the Competent authority of AICTE hasallowed the institute for an intake of 60 to 90in MBA for the academic year 2009-10. Theorders with regard to the amendments would beissued by AICTE, New Delhi shortly.
The same can be presented before the Hon''ble High Court of Madras.
Yours faithfully,
Sd/- xxxx
(M. Sundaresan)
Regional Officer
2. In view of the said development, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. Therefore, the Writ Petition is closed and the above letter dated 28.10.2010 is placed on record. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
