XXXXXXXXXX Vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala 19 Jul 2022 Bail Application No.4797 Of 2022 (2022) 07 KL CK 0165
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Bail Application No.4797 Of 2022

Hon'ble Bench

Bechu Kurian Thomas, J

Advocates

M.T.Sureshkumar, R.Ranjith, Smitha Philipose, P.R.Jayasankar, Darsan Somanath, Manjusha K, Sreelakshmi Sabu, M.K Pushpalatha

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 439
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 354D, 376(2)(n)
  • Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - Section 3(a), 4, 5(i), 5(j)(ii), 6

Judgement Text

Translate:

Bechu Kurian Thomas, J

1. This is an application for regular bail filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

2. Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.354/2022 of Kollam West Police Station, Kollam District. The offences alleged against the petitioner are

under Sections 354D, 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 4 r/w Section 3(a) Section 6 r/w Section 5(j)(ii) and Section 5(i) of the

Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012

3. The prosecution allegation is that, petitioner committed aggravated penetrative sexual assault on 17 year old victim during January 2022 and

thereafter, impregnated her and thus committed the offences alleged against him.

4. Sri.M.T.Suresh Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner and the victim were in a relationship and that the allegations

are totally false. It was further pointed out that the petitioner and the victim are intending to get married, which is evident from the notarized affidavit

filed by the mother of the victim, produced as Annexure II. It was further submitted that the petitioner was arrested on 25.06.2022 and that the

investigation is almost complete and no purpose would be served by continuing the detention of the petitioner.

5. Smt.M.K.Pushpalatha, learned Public Prosecutor, on the other hand opposed the grant of bail and submitted that there is every chance that the

petitioner may influence the witnesses or even intimidate them .

6. A perusal of the case diary reveals that prima facie there are materials on record to connect the petitioner with the crime. However, since the

petitioner was remanded to judicial custody on 25.06.2022, I am of the view that the continued detention of the petitioner is not required in the

circumstances of the case. Therefore, the petitioner is entitled to be released on bail.

In the result, this application is allowed on the following conditions:-

(i) Petitioner shall be released on bail on him executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the

satisfaction of the court having jurisdiction.

(ii) Petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required;

(iii) Petitioner shall not intimidate or attempt to influence the witnesses; nor shall he tamper with the evidence or contact the defacto complainant or her family

members.

(iv) Petitioner shall not commit any similar offences while he is on bail.

(v) Petitioner shall not leave India without the permission of the Court having jurisdiction.

In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the jurisdictional Court shall be empowered to consider the application for cancellation, if any, and

pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law, notwithstanding the bail having been granted by this Court.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More