Mithu Surendran Vs Mundakkayam Grama Panchayat, Represented By Its Secretary

High Court Of Kerala 30 Jul 2024 Writ Petition (C) No. 26905 Of 2024 (2024) 07 KL CK 0113
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition (C) No. 26905 Of 2024

Hon'ble Bench

Mohammed Nias C.P., J

Advocates

Liji.J.Vadakedom, Athul V. Vadakkedom, Rexy Elizabeth Thomas, Chithra Chandrasekharan,

Final Decision

Allowed

Judgement Text

Translate:

Mohammed Nias C.P., J.

1. The petitioner challenges Ext.P4 order rejecting his application for a building permit on the ground that the property shown as Plantation (Thottam in the revenue records).

2. Both sides submits that the issue is covered in favour of the petitioner by the judgment in Mathew K.Jacob v. District Environmental Impact Assessment Authority [2018 (4) KLT 913 (F.B.)], Kinallur Rock Sand v. State of Kerala [2021 (2) KLT 351] and also in the recent decision in District Collector v. Sajith Lal [2023 KLT Online 1225] which held that merely because the property was exempted under the Act as a plantation, there was no restriction on using the property for other purposes.

3. In view of the above, Ext.P4 is quashed. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 1st and 2nd respondents to reconsider the application for building permit submitted by the petitioner, the application is otherwise in order subject to the relevant Building Rules. It shall be done within a period of one month from today.

The writ petition is allowed as above.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More