Suresh Kumar Vs P K Vijayakumar

High Court Of Kerala 2 Dec 2024 Criminal Revision Petition No. 108 OF 2023 (2024) 12 KL CK 0009
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Revision Petition No. 108 OF 2023

Hon'ble Bench

Dr. Kauser Edappagath, J

Advocates

M.T.Sureshkumar, Darsan Somanath, Manjusha K, Sreelakshmi Sabu, P.R.Jayasankar, K.S.Sajeev Kumar, Devipriya Sathyaseelan, Bismi T.A., Mohandas K.Chacko, Sukesan P.S, Ramesh.P.N., Sudheer G

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 357(1), 357(3)#Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Section 138, 138(b), 139

Judgement Text

Translate:

3. Before the trial court, the complainant was examined as PW1 and Exts. P1 to P5 were marked. No evidence was adduced by the revisio

petitioner/accused. After trial, the trial court found that the revision petitioner has committed offence punishable under Section 138 of the NI Act and

he was convicted and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for two months and to pay a fine of ₹7,00,000/-, in default, to suffer simple

imprisonment for thirty days. The fine amount, if realised, was ordered to be paid to the 1st respondent as compensation under Section 357(1) of the

Cr.P.C. The revision petitioner challenged the said judgment before the appellate court in Crl.A.No.70/2018. The appellate court dismissed the appea

confirming the conviction and sentence. This criminal revision petition has been filed challenging both the judgments of the trial court and the appellate

court.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Rejects NALSA Appeal Filed Sans Convict Consent
Oct
30
2025

Story

Supreme Court Rejects NALSA Appeal Filed Sans Convict Consent
Read More
Supreme Court Raps Insurers for Technical Appeals in Claims
Oct
30
2025

Story

Supreme Court Raps Insurers for Technical Appeals in Claims
Read More