🖨️ Print / Download PDF

Janab OMS Abdul Basith Alim Sahib Vs O.M.S. Sheik Udhuman Alim Sahib, Hassan Magdhoom Alim Sahib and Tamil Nadu Wakf Board No. 1 Jaffar Shyrang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar Chennai - 600 001

Case No: C.R.P. (PD) (MD) No. 649 of 2011

Date of Decision: Aug. 23, 2011

Hon'ble Judges: C.S. Karnan, J

Bench: Single Bench

Advocate: G. Prabhurajadura, for the Appellant; R. Manimaran and Mr. S. Meenakshisundaram, for R-1 and R-2 and Mr. K.K. Senthil for R-3, for the Respondent

Translate: English | हिन्दी | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | ಕನ್ನಡ | मराठी

Judgement

@JUDGMENTTAG-ORDER

The Honourable Mr. Justice C.S. Karnan

1. This petition has been filed by the Petitioner/plaintiff to set aside the order dated 30.11.2010 passed in O.S. No. 113 of 2010 by the Wakf

Tribunal (Principal Subordinate Court) Tirunelveli.

2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:

The revision Petitioner/plaintiff has filed a suit in O.S. No. 113 of 2010 before the Wakf Tribunal (Principal Subordinate Court), Tirunelveli, against

the Respondents/defendants to pass a decree against the Defendants viz., (a) for declaring the order of the 3rd Defendant dated 22.10.2009 as

null and void; (b) consequently declaring the Plaintiff as the hereditary muthawali for the schedule mentioned Seyeed Masood Nayagam Durgah at

Kadayanallur; (c) Directing the second Respondent to deliver possession of the same and for other relief.

3. The Learned Counsel for the revision Petitioner argued that the said suit has been dismissed by the learned Judge. Actually, several issues arise

in the said suit only. After framing all the issues, the case can be decided after conducting proper trial. In support of his contention, he had cited a

judgement reported in 2010(6)MLJ 527.

4. The Learned Counsel for the first and second Respondent and the Learned Counsel for the 3rd Respondent have also agreed for disposal of the

suit on merits after proper adjudication.

5. In the facts and circumstances of the case and arguments advanced by the Learned Counsels for their respective parties and on perusing the

impugned order of the learned Judge, this Court is of the considered opinion that the main suit has to be disposed of on merits after hearing all the

parties concerned. Therefore, this Court directs the learned principal subordinate Judge to dispose of the case in O.S. No. 113 of 2010 on merits,

within a period of six months from the date of receipt of this order, after giving opportunity to the parties concerned.

6. Resultantly, the above civil revision petition is disposed of with the above observations. Consequently, the order and decretal order passed in

O.S. No. 113 of 2010 on the file of the Wakf Tribunal (Principal Subordinate Court) Tirunelveli is set aside. Connected miscellaneous petition is

closed. There is no order as to costs.