Hirn alias Akbar Ali Mahomed Vs Emperor

Calcutta High Court 9 Sep 1914 (1914) 09 CAL CK 0003
Bench: Division Bench
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Hon'ble Bench

Lawrence Jenkins, C.J; Teunon, J

Acts Referred
  • Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (CrPC) - Section 110, 118, 122

Judgement Text

Translate:

1. In this case the accused-petitioner had been required to furinish security for good behaviour u/s 110 read with Section 110 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Thereupon lie offered two sureties, and the matter was referred by the Magistrate to the Police for inquiry. The Police submitted a report to the effect that the sureties were not acceptable and, proceeding upon that report, the Magistrate refused to accept the sureties. It has been repeatedly pointed out that sureties offered should not be refused except after judicial enquiry by the Magistrate who has made the order u/s 118, such inquiry to be made under the provisions of Section 122 of the Criminal Procedure Code. This Rule was, therefore, granted calling upon the Deputy Commissioner to show cause why the petitioner should not be given an opportunity of showing that the sureties offered were fit to be accepted. No cause has been shown and on the facts we have stated, we make this Rule absolute and direct that the Magistrate d o now hold an inquiry in accordance with law and upon that enquiry decide whether the sureties offered are or are not fit persons.

2. Pending this further inquiry the sureties offered will be provisionally accepted. Rule made absolute.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More