Mahendrabhai @ M. D Desaibhai Parmar Vs State Of Gujarat

Gujarat High Court 9 Jun 2021 R/Criminal Misc.Application No. 3864 Of 2021 (2021) 06 GUJ CK 0066
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

R/Criminal Misc.Application No. 3864 Of 2021

Hon'ble Bench

A.Y. Kogje, J

Advocates

Pradip J Patel, Ronak Raval

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred
  • Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 439
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 114, 344, 365, 376(2)(N), 506(2)
  • Gujarat Police Act, 1951 - Section 135

Judgement Text

Translate:

A.Y. Kogje, J

1. The present application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for regular bail in connection with FIR being I-CR

No.11207078200658 of 2020 registered with Kankanpur Police Station, Panchamahal for offence under Sections 365, 506(2), 376(2)(N), 344 and 114

of the Indian Penal Code and Section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act.

2. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular

bail by imposing suitable conditions.

3. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed grant of regular bail looking to the nature and gravity of the offence.

4. Learned Advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties do not press for further reasoned order.

5. I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the papers. Following aspects are considered:-

I. The FIR is registered on 20.12.2020 for the offence which is alleged to have taken place between 28.10.2020 to 19.12.2020.

II. The applicant is in jail since 22.12.2020.

III. The investigation is concluded and charge-sheet is filed.

IV. Submission of learned advocate for the applicant that even considering the statement of the prosecutrix and the fact that both of them had resided

at some place for almost period of two months, element of consensual relation cannot ruled out.

V. Submission of learned advocate for the applicant that both the applicant and the prosecutrix are major and were respectively married, thereafter

the present incident has taken place.

VI. No antecedents are reported against the applicant, as per learned advocate for the applicant

VII. Learned APP under instructions of IO is unable to bring on record any special circumstances against the applicant.

6. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the FIR, without discussing

the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

7. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail in connection with FIR being I-CR

No.11207078200658 of 2020 registered with Kankanpur Police Station, Panchamahal, on executing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten

Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;

(a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

(b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution & shall not obstruct or hamper the police investigation and shall not to play mischief

with the evidence collected or yet to be collected by the police;

(c) surrender passport, if any, to the Trial Court within a week;

(d) not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Trial Court concerned;

(e) mark presence before the concerned Police Station once in a month for a period of six months between 11.00 a.m. and 2.00 p.m.;

(f) furnish the present address of his residence to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not

change the residence without prior permission of Trial Court;

8. The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the

above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.

9. Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or

relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law.

10. At the trial, the trial Court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature qua the evidence at this stage made by this Court while

enlarging the applicant on bail.

11. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More