Pankaj Purohit, J
1. By means of this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the order dated 23.08.2023 passed under Section 14 of The Securitization and
Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short the SARFAESI Act) whereby the respondents Bank
was directed to take possession of the secured assets i.e. mortgaged property.
2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the respondents-Bank that the notice under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act was issued to the petitioner
on
23. 08.2023 and petitioner remained silent without challenging the said order before any forum, available to him under law.
3. It is contended by learned counsel for the respondents-bank that pursuant to the aforesaid notice possession of the secured assets have already
been taken over by the bank on 05.09.2024. It is submitted by learned counsel for the respondents-bank that in between one year time has elapsed and
petitioner remained silent and did not proceed for any kind of settlement with the respondents-bank nor did he pay any single penny towards said
outstanding loan amount.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents bank further relied upon the judgment passed by Hon’ble Apex Court in Special Leave to
Appeal(C)No(s).22093-22094/2022;06.07.2023 M/s Phoenix Arc Private Limited vs. V. Ganesh Murthy & Another whereby it has been held that writ
petition would not lie against the order passed under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act as the remedy is available to the borrower before the Debt
Recovery Tribunal established under The Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993.
5. Accordingly, there is no scope to interfere with the aforesaid writ petition. The writ petition is dismissed.