Liladhar Vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court 30 Dec 2024 First Bail Application No. 2100 Of 2024
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

First Bail Application No. 2100 Of 2024

Hon'ble Bench

Ravindra Maithani, J

Advocates

Shariq Khurshid, Pramod Tiwari

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — Section 3(5), 304(2), 305, 317(2)

Judgement Text

Translate:

Ravindra Maithani, J

1. Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR No. 303 of 2024, under Section 304 (2), 305, 317 (2), 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police

Station Kunda, District Udham Singh Nagar. He has sought his release on bail.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the alleged recovery is false. The applicant has not snatched any mobile.

4. Learned State counsel would submit that the applicant could be spotted in the lift while entering in the hospital alongwith the co-accused, but as per

the CCTV record, it is the co-accused who snatched the mobile phone.

5. Having considered the entirety of facts, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

6. The bail application is allowed.

7. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the

satisfaction of the Court concerned.

From The Blog
SC: Written Arrest Grounds Mandatory, Oral Explanation Insufficient
Oct
18
2025

Story

SC: Written Arrest Grounds Mandatory, Oral Explanation Insufficient
Read More
SC Raps Insurers for Unnecessary Appeals, Delaying Payouts
Oct
18
2025

Story

SC Raps Insurers for Unnecessary Appeals, Delaying Payouts
Read More