Kajal Rana And Another Vs State Of Uttarakhand And Another

Uttarakhand High Court 30 Dec 2024 Criminal Miscellaneous Application U/s 482 No. 291 Of 2024 (2024) 12 UK CK 0102
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Miscellaneous Application U/s 482 No. 291 Of 2024

Hon'ble Bench

Pankaj Purohit, J

Advocates

Lalit Sharma, B.C. Joshi

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 420
  • Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 - Section 3, 4, 5, 6
  • Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 161, 482

Judgement Text

Translate:

Pankaj Purohit, J

1. Present C482 application has been preferred by the applicants assailing the cognizance order dated 07.06.2022, passed by learned Judicial

Magistrate, Sitarganj, Udham Singh Nagar in Criminal Case No.324 of 2022 (FIR No.0357 of 2021), State Vs. Krishna Kumar Potar and others,

punishable under Section 420 of IPC r/w Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as “Act of

1956â€​) along with a further prayer to quash the entire proceedings of the aforesaid case, qua, the applicants.

2. Facts in a nutshell are that an FIR was lodged being FIR No.0357 of 2021 at Police Station Sitarganj, Udham Singh Nagar for the offence

punishable under Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the Act of 1956.

3. In the FIR the applicants were also named as an accused; the matter was investigated and a charge sheet was submitted against the accused

persons along with present applicants as well for the aforesaid offences. Accordingly the court concerned on the said charge sheet took cognizance

and summoned the accused applicants to face trial. Hence an application under Section 482 of the CrPC has been filed before this Court.

4. It is case of the applicants that at the time of alleged incident they were newly engaged and were only having meals in the restaurant; the Police

had falsely implicated the applicants in the case; there is no material on record to suggest that the applicants were paid any money either by them or

by any third party and in absence of any material that any physical relations were developed between the parties for any commercial purpose, the

provisions of the Act are not attracted against the applicants. Learned counsel for the applicants further submits that later on both the applicants have

entered into nuptial bond on 15.12.2023.

5. In order to implicate the person into the crime, it is a primary requirement to prove that accused was a sex worker and was involved as co-

conspirator in the crime.

6. The order passed by the Court is a cryptic one without any applicability of mind and the same is liable to be set aside.

7. On the other hand, learned State counsel argued that at the time of incident the applicants were not married.

8. On the date of incident, the accused were found in objectionable condition and with objectionable items, which fact can be gathered from the

recovery memo. Even the Police witnesses have fully supported the contents of recovery memo in their statement recorded under Section 161 CrPC

against the applicants.

9. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents available on record.

10. It is not in dispute that on the date of alleged incident the applicants had been engaged and they had gone at the alleged place just to have their

meals; there is no material available on record to suggest that they were actually involved in connection with the alleged crime; the applicants have

been made a scapegoat; it is case of the prosecution that in the room of applicants a third person was also present; however there is no documentary

or oral evidence on record to show their involvement with the said person by any means. This is also an admitted fact that both the applicants

solemnized marriage on 15.12.2023 (Annexure 1 to the C482 application affidavit).

11. Moreover the applicant no.1 has been selected as Constable in Delhi Police and her training commenced from 01.07.2024 at Delhi Police

Academy, but due to this case her entire career is at stake.

12. Thus it cannot be said that the applicants were involved in management of premises in any way assisting the accused persons in managing the

activities of the premises.

13. In view of the forgoing reasons, I am of the considered view that no offence under the Act of 1956 or under any penal section is made out against

the applicants.

14. Accordingly the present C482 application is allowed and entire proceedings of in Criminal Case No.324 of 2022 (FIR No.0357 of 2021), State Vs.

Krishna Kumar Potar and others, pending before the court of Judicial Magistrate, Sitarganj, Udham Singh Nagar are quashedq, ua, the applicants

only.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More