Commnr. of Central Excise, Bangalore Vs Faxwell Printers, Bangalore

Supreme Court of India 27 Nov 2008 Civil Appeal No''s. 333-334 of 2001 (2009) 1 SCC 473
Bench: Full Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Civil Appeal No''s. 333-334 of 2001

Hon'ble Bench

P. Sathasivam, J; Arijit Pasayat, J; Aftab Alam, J

Advocates

G.E. Vahanvati, S.G., T.A. Khan, Devadatt Kamat, Rahul Kaushik, S.N. Terdal, B. Krishna Prasad, V. Lakshmi Kumaran, Alok Yadav and Rajesh Kumar, for the Appellant; V. Lakshum Kumaran, Alok Yadav, M.P. Devanath, Rana Mukherjee, Siddharth Gautam, Goodwill Indeevar, Ravinder Narain, Sonu Bhatnagar, Ajay Aggarwal, Sudha Malla and Rajan Narain, for the Respondent

Final Decision

Dismissed

Judgement Text

Translate:

Arijit Pasayat, J.@mdashChallenge in these appeals is to the judgment of Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal

Bench at Madras (in short `CEGAT''). In these cases the CEGAT followed the order passed in the case of Srikumar Agencies who was one of

the respondents in Civil Appeal Nos. 4872-4892 of 2000. By our separate judgment today in Civil Appeal Nos. 4872-4892 of 2000, we have

set aside the order of CEGAT and remitted the matter to it to be dealt with afresh. The decision in the said case shall apply to the facts of the

present case.

2. The appeals will be heard afresh by the appropriate bench of CEGAT which is presently known as Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate

Tribunal (in short `CESTAT'').

3. Since the matter is pending for long, we request the CESTAT to dispose of the appeals as early as possible preferably by the end of February,

2009.

4. The appeals are allowed.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Rejects NALSA Appeal Filed Sans Convict Consent
Oct
30
2025

Story

Supreme Court Rejects NALSA Appeal Filed Sans Convict Consent
Read More
Supreme Court Raps Insurers for Technical Appeals in Claims
Oct
30
2025

Story

Supreme Court Raps Insurers for Technical Appeals in Claims
Read More