Union of India (UOI) and Others Vs G.D. Pharmaceuticals Limited and Another

Supreme Court of India 15 Sep 1997 S.L.P. (Civil) No. 17949 of 1997 (1997) 09 SC CK 0149
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

S.L.P. (Civil) No. 17949 of 1997

Hon'ble Bench

Sujata V. Manohar, J; D. P. Wadhwa, J

Advocates

K.N. Bhatt, Additional Solicitor-General, S. Wasim Qadri and V.K. Verma, for the Appellant; D.P. Gupta, Senior Advocate, Nemani Bose, V.D. Khanna and A.K. Banerjee, for the Respondent

Final Decision

Allowed

Judgement Text

Translate:

@JUDGMENTTAG-ORDER

1. Delay condoned.

2. In view of the detailed judgment of the High Court which holds that the present product contains only Boric Acid with Zinc Oxide and it cannot possibly be termed as a Cosmetic or Toilet preparation, we do not see any reason to interfere. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed.

Uttarakhand HC
Vikram Singh Chaudhary Vs State Of Uttarakhand And Another
29 Dec 2025
Uttarakhand HC
Dharmendra Kumar Agarwal Vs State Of Uttarakhand
29 Dec 2025
From The Blog
CBSE Suspends Gurugram School’s Affiliation; Spotlight on Rules That Protect Students Nationwide
Jan
01
2026

Court News

CBSE Suspends Gurugram School’s Affiliation; Spotlight on Rules That Protect Students Nationwide
Read More
Delhi High Court Rules: Voice Samples for Call Matching Do Not Violate Fundamental Rights
Jan
01
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Rules: Voice Samples for Call Matching Do Not Violate Fundamental Rights
Read More
Quick Actions
Download PDF Open PDF in New Tab
Case Metadata
  • Citation: AIR 1997 SC 538 : AIR 1997 SC 465 : (1997) 75 FLR 786 : (1997) 1 JT 363 : (1997) 1 SCALE 132 : (1997) 2 SCC 33 : (1997) SCC(L&S) 315 : (1997) 1 SCR 64 : (1997) 1 Supreme 283 : (1997) AIRSCW 378
  • Ck Citation: (1997) 09 SC CK 0149
  • Coram: Sujata V. Manohar, J; D. P. Wadhwa, J
  • Bench: Division Bench
  • Advocates: K.N. Bhatt, Additional Solicitor-General, S. Wasim Qadri and V.K. Verma, for the Appellant; D.P. Gupta, Senior Advocate, Nemani Bose, V.D. Khanna and A.K. Banerjee, for the Respondent
  • Result: Allowed
Stay Updated

Subscribe for weekly highlights on judgements, legal insights, and workflow tips.