Murlidhar Jaiswal Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court 30 Sep 2019 Writ Petition (S) No. 7917 Of 2019 (2019) 09 CHH CK 0185
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition (S) No. 7917 Of 2019

Hon'ble Bench

P. Sam Koshy, J

Advocates

Swajeet Singh Ubeja, Astha Shukla, P. Acharya

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Acts Referred

Chhattisgarh Civil Services (Classification, Control And Appeal) Rules, 1966 — Rule 18

Judgement Text

Translate:

P. Sam Koshy, J

1. Challenge in the present writ petition is to the charge sheet dated 06.09.2018 initiated against the petitioner.

2. Challenge is on the ground that the respondent authorities have not complied with the requirement under Rule 18 of the Chhattisgarh Civil Services

(Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1966 (in short, Rules, 1966) so far as joint enquiry part is concerned.

3. According to the petitioner, there is another officer namely Ashish Arora, an Inspector in the department who has also been subjected to face

similar departmental enquiry for the same charges and the enquiry is being proceeded together by the respondents. However, while holding joint

enquiry, the requirement, as is required under Rule 18 of Rules, 1966 has not been complied with.

4. Given the aforesaid limited grievance that the petitioner has, this court is of the opinion that the respondents No.3&4 would ensure that requirement

under Rule 18 of Rules, 1966 is complied with and necessary steps in this regard would be taken by the respondents before proceeding further with

the Departmental Enquiry.

5. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of.

From The Blog
SC: Brother Can Sell Father’s House Even Without Share
Oct
31
2025

Story

SC: Brother Can Sell Father’s House Even Without Share
Read More
SC to Decide If Women Can Face POCSO Penetrative Assault
Oct
31
2025

Story

SC to Decide If Women Can Face POCSO Penetrative Assault
Read More