Shanti Ekka Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court 19 Feb 2019 Writ Petition (S) No. 1104 Of 2019 (2019) 02 CHH CK 0309
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition (S) No. 1104 Of 2019

Hon'ble Bench

P. Sam Koshy, J

Advocates

Sanjay Pathak, Saleem Kazi

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Judgement Text

Translate:

P. Sam Koshy, J

1. The limited grievance of the petitioner in the instant Writ Petition is that, though the petitioner has been appointed on the post of Siksha Karmi -

Grade-III on 03/08/1998 and till date the petitioner continues to discharge the duties of Siksha Karmi - Grade-III and though she has put in more than

20 years of service, but till date the petitioner has not been paid even the benefit of first Kramonnati that she is entitled for, though as per rules by now

she is entitled for two Kramonnatis.

2. Given the limited grievance that the petitioner has raised, let the petitioner file an appropriate representation to the respondents No. 3 & 4 within a

period of 2 weeks' from today and the respondents No. 3 & 4 shall immediately process the claim of the petitioner and pass an appropriate order

within a further period of 60 days from the date of receipt of representation.

3. It is made clear that, in case if it is found that, the petitioner is entitled for the benefit of Kramonnati, the same should be released forthwith without

any further delay inclusive of arrears also.

4. The Writ Petition accordingly stands disposed off.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Clarifies Section 27 Evidence Act: Only “Fact Discovered” Admissible, Not Entire Statement
Nov
19
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Clarifies Section 27 Evidence Act: Only “Fact Discovered” Admissible, Not Entire Statement
Read More
Bar Council of India Defends Rules Allowing Foreign Law Firms in Delhi High Court
Nov
19
2025

Court News

Bar Council of India Defends Rules Allowing Foreign Law Firms in Delhi High Court
Read More