Ali Baksh Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court 26 Feb 2019 Writ Petition (S) No. 1319 Of 2019
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition (S) No. 1319 Of 2019

Hon'ble Bench

P. Sam Koshy, J

Advocates

Sudeep Agrawal, Saleem Kazi

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Judgement Text

Translate:

P. Sam Koshy, J

1. The challenge in the present Writ Petition is to the order Annexure-P/1 dated 18/02/2019 whereby the petitioner has been transferred showing him

to be an employee of the Regional Office of the respondent No.3 at Bilaspur and has been transferred to Jagdalpur.

2. The contention of the counsel for the petitioner is that, on 18/02/2019 when Annexure-P/1 was issued, the petitioner infact was not an employee on

the rolls of the respondent No.3 at Bilaspur. The petitioner substantively was working as an Assistant Engineer at the Municipal Corporation, Korba.

Though there was an order of transfer on 28/01/2019 transferring the petitioner from Korba to Bilaspur but he had not been relieved till 19/02/2019

when he was for the first time relieved and has joined his services at Bilaspur on the same day i.e. on 19/02/2019. That after he gave his joining, the

petitioner has now been served with a fresh order of transfer transferring him from Bilaspur to Jagdalpur.

3. The impugned order dated 18/02/2019 shows the petitioner to be substantively an employee of the Regional Office of Bilaspur whereas he has

joined at Bilaspur only on 19/02/2019 and till 19/02/2019 the petitioner was substantively an employee of Municipal Corporation, Korba.

4. This fact itself shows that while transferring the petitioner from Bilaspur to Jagdalpur, there does not seem to be any administrative exigency or

application of mind. Otherwise, the petitioner would not have been shown to be an employee of the Regional Office at Bilaspur since he had not

assumed the office at Bilaspur on 18/02/2019 when Annexure-P/1 was issued.

5. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner make a fresh representation to the respondent No.1 within a period of 10 days from

today raising all these facts, apprising the respondent No.1 in respect of the same. That the respondent No.1 in turn shall reconsider the case of the

petitioner and pass a fresh order within an outer limit of 60 days thereafter.

6. Till the representation of the petitioner if the same is filed within 10 days is decided, the petitioner should not be relieved from his present place of

posting i.e. from Regional Office at Bilaspur until further orders.

7. It is made clear that, till the representation of the petitioner is decided, ex-parte relieving order if any issued to the petitioner would also not been

given effect to.

8. The Writ Petition accordingly stands disposed off.

From The Blog
Supreme Court to Rule on Multi-State Societies in IBC Cases
Oct
25
2025

Story

Supreme Court to Rule on Multi-State Societies in IBC Cases
Read More
Supreme Court: Minors Can Void Property Sales by Guardians
Oct
25
2025

Story

Supreme Court: Minors Can Void Property Sales by Guardians
Read More