Vijay Kumar Jangde Vs Mahindra And Mahindra Financial Service Limited And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court 12 Sep 2018 Writ Petition (227) No. 785 Of 2018
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition (227) No. 785 Of 2018

Hon'ble Bench

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J

Advocates

A. D. Kuldeep

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Acts Referred

Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 36

Judgement Text

Translate:

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that ex-parte award has been passed by the learned Arbitrator in favour of respondent No. 1 and for the

execution of the award an application under Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed by the respondent No. 1 in which

he may be allowed to make objection opposing the execution proceedings.

2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. Be that as it may, the petitioner is at liberty to raise objection opposing the execution proceedings before the executing Court that will be considered

and decided by the executing Court in accordance with law.

4. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

From The Blog
Supreme Court: 8-Year Service Termination Cannot Be Justified
Oct
23
2025

Story

Supreme Court: 8-Year Service Termination Cannot Be Justified
Read More
Supreme Court Asks Centre to Respond on Online Gambling Ban
Oct
23
2025

Story

Supreme Court Asks Centre to Respond on Online Gambling Ban
Read More