Sukhlal Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court 26 Sep 2018 Writ Petition (C) No. 2647 Of 2018 (2018) 09 CHH CK 0411
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition (C) No. 2647 Of 2018

Hon'ble Bench

Prashant Kumar Mishra, J

Advocates

Atanu Ghosh, Rajendra Tripathi

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Acts Referred
  • Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959 - Section 178
  • Code Of Civil Procedure 1908 - Order 39 Rule 1, Order 39 Rule 2

Judgement Text

Translate:

Prashant Kumar Mishra, J

1. The proceedings under Section 178 of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959 for partition of the agricultural holdings are pending before the

Tehsildar, Ramanujnagar, District Surajpur. The Tehsildar stayed the proceedings enabling the parties to prefer a suit because on an objection raised

by the petitioner, the Tehsildar observed that there exists dispute of title between the parties. It is this order which has eventually been vacated by the

Board of Revenue by its impugned order dated 03.04.2018 and thus the proceedings before the Tehsildar have been continued.

2. It appears, the petitioner is raising question of title before the Revenue Board, therefore, either of the party, including the petitioner, could have

preferred a suit seeking declaration of title to the extent of his share or exclusive ownership over the property.

3. Let the petitioner prefer a suit within a period of 3 months along with an application for grant of temporary injunction. For a period of 4 months from

today or till the petitioner's application under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of CPC is taken up for consideration, whichever is earlier, the party shall maintain

status quo in respect of the suit property. This order of status quo shall lose its efficacy immediately after expiry of 4 months.

4. The writ petition stands disposed of.

From The Blog
SC: Brother Can Sell Father’s House Even Without Share
Oct
31
2025

Story

SC: Brother Can Sell Father’s House Even Without Share
Read More
SC to Decide If Women Can Face POCSO Penetrative Assault
Oct
31
2025

Story

SC to Decide If Women Can Face POCSO Penetrative Assault
Read More