Devki Bai Dubey Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court 8 Aug 2018 Miscellaneous Criminal Case (MCRC) No. 5289 Of 2018 (2018) 08 CHH CK 0119
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Miscellaneous Criminal Case (MCRC) No. 5289 Of 2018

Hon'ble Bench

Goutam Bhaduri, J

Advocates

Arvind Dubey, SRJ Jaiswal

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred

Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 304B, 306, 498A#Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439

Judgement Text

Translate:

Goutam Bhaduri, J

1. This is the Second Bail Application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has

been arrested on 27.02.2018 in connection with Crime No. 60/2018 registered at Police Station P.S. Takhatpur, Dist. Bilaspur (CG) for the offence

punishable under Sections 498A, 306, 304 (B)/34 IPC.

2. The First Bail Application was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh after filing of the charge-sheet vide M.Cr.C. No.2432/2018.

3. As per the prosecution case, one Rashmi Dubey died of hanging on 04.02.2018 and she was married to Amit Dubey on 05.02.2017. It is the case of

the prosecution that she died unnatural death because of the demand of dowry made by the family members, which includes the present applicant

namely Devki Bai Dubey, who is the mother-in-law. Consequently she died unnatural death within a period of one year.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the charge-sheet in this case has been filed. He further submits that the merg statement which was

recorded immediately after the incident that of the mother of the deceased would show that no allegation of demand of dowry has been made against

the present applicant and the omnibus allegations have been made, therefore, the applicant may be released on bail.

5. Per contra, learned State counsel opposes the prayer for grant of bail and submits that the allegations are attributed jointly against the present

applicant including the husband of the deceased.

6. Perused the case-diary and the statement of Himanshu Pandey recorded on 04.02.2018. The primary reading of the statement shows that the

allegations have been attributed to the husband Amit. Likewise the statement of the mother Smt. Manju Pandey and sister Neha Pandey. Considering

the statements, I am inclined to release the applicant on bail.

7. Accordingly, the application is allowed and the applicant is directed to be released on bail on her executing a personal bond in sum of Rs.25,000/-

with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the trial Court. She is directed to appear before the trial Court on each and every date given by

the said Court.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Halts GST Assessment on Joint Development Deals
Oct
28
2025

Story

Supreme Court Halts GST Assessment on Joint Development Deals
Read More
Supreme Court Explains Demurrer Law in Neelkanth Realty Case
Oct
28
2025

Story

Supreme Court Explains Demurrer Law in Neelkanth Realty Case
Read More