Bhuvneshwar Gan Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court 9 Aug 2018 WPCR No. 454 Of 2018 (2018) 08 CHH CK 0142
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

WPCR No. 454 Of 2018

Hon'ble Bench

Goutam Bhaduri, J

Advocates

Punit Ruparel, SK Mishra

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Judgement Text

Translate:

Goutam Bhaduri, J

1. Heard.

2. The instant petition is filed for the reason that respondent No.6 Rajesh Mishra is misusing the power and using third degree method on the petitioner

and threatening for the reason that the FIR has been lodged on his instance.

3. In any case, the nature of complaint which is made it involves different facts about the authenticity of the same. At this stage, this Court is not

inclined to pass any opinion as to whether the complaint so made is a gospel truth or not. The petitioner would be at liberty to approach the higher

officials in case of need and make representation. In case the representation is made, the police higher officials are expected to make impartial

enquiry in the matter.

4. With such observation, the writ petition stands disposed of.

From The Blog
Delhi High Court Clarifies: ‘No Coercive Measures’ Protects Only Against Arrest, Not Investigation Stay
Nov
06
2025

Court News

Delhi High Court Clarifies: ‘No Coercive Measures’ Protects Only Against Arrest, Not Investigation Stay
Read More
Supreme Court Orders Compensatory Plantation on 185 Acres in Delhi Ridge by March 2026
Nov
06
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Orders Compensatory Plantation on 185 Acres in Delhi Ridge by March 2026
Read More