Yadunandan Rathore Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court 27 Aug 2018 Miscellaneous Criminal Case (MCRC) No. 5526 Of 2018 (2018) 08 CHH CK 0289
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Miscellaneous Criminal Case (MCRC) No. 5526 Of 2018

Hon'ble Bench

Arvind Singh Chandel, J

Advocates

B.P. Sharma, Anil Pandey

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred
  • Prevention Of Corruption Act, 1988 - Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2)
  • Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 439

Judgement Text

Translate:

Arvind Singh Chandel, J

1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the Applicant who has been

arrested in connection with Crime No.12 of 2018 registered at Police Station Anti Corruption Bureau, Raipur for offence punishable under Sections 7,

13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

2. The prosecution case, in brief, is that at the relevant time, the Applicant was working as a District Excise Officer and was posted at Dhamtari. The

Complainant had an under-construction house at Danitola in which a wine shop of the Government was being run on a rent of Rs.1,20,000/- per

month. Out of the said rent, the Applicant had demanded Rs.25,000/- per month as commission. On the basis of a report of the Complainant, the

Applicant was trapped on 2.7.2018 and tainted money of Rs.25,000/- was recovered and seized from him.

3. Learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant submits that the Applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. He never demanded any money

from the Complainant as bribe or commission nor was any tainted money recovered from his possession. From the evidence collected by the

prosecution itself, it is clear that the tainted money was recovered from the diary which was kept on a table. The Applicant is in custody since

2.7.2018. Trial will take much more time. Therefore, he may be released on bail.

4. Learned Counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

5. I have heard Learned Counsel appearing for the parties and perused the entire case diary with due care.

6. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, further considering that the tainted money was recovered from the diary which was

kept on a table, without further commenting on merits of the case, I am inclined to release the Applicant on bail.

7. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

8. It is directed that the Applicant shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with one solvent surety of the like

sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court for his appearance before the said Court as and when directed.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More