Birbal Yadav Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court 19 Jul 2018 Miscellaneous Criminal Case (MCRC) No. 3719 Of 2018 (2018) 07 CHH CK 0242
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Miscellaneous Criminal Case (MCRC) No. 3719 Of 2018

Hon'ble Bench

Sharad Kumar Gupta, J

Advocates

Ashish Gupta, Dheeraj Wankhede

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 363, 366A, 376
  • Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 439
  • Protection Of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - Section 4, 6

Judgement Text

Translate:

Sharad Kumar Gupta, J

1. This is first bail application under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. preferred by the applicant before this Court and no other bail application is pending

before any other Court.

2. Perused the case diary provided by the learned counsel for the State in connection with crime No. 65/2018 registered at Police Station - Kotra

Road, District - Raigarh (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 363, 366A, 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4 and 6 of the

Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

3. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the date of birth of the prosecutrix is 07.06.2000 and resident of village - Patrapali, District - Raigarh. There

was a love affair between the applicant and the prosecutrix. On 14.03.2018 she compelled the applicant, he took away her. Thereafter, she went

along with the applicant. They lived together in village Gerwani, where they had physical relations.

4. The applicant is in custody since 18.03.2018.

5. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has no criminal background. He is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the

present case, therefore, he shall be released on bail.

6. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application, however, he submits that there is no antecedent against the applicant.

7. In the certified copy of the statement of the prosecutrix taken by the Trial Court she had stated that she had gone to her Badi Mummy Nohar Bai

at Kirodimalnagar without intimating any of her family members. The applicant has not committed anything with her.

8. Looking to these facts and circumstances of the case, looking to the fact that there is no antecedent against the applicant, there is no likelihood of

the accused to abscond and tamper the evidence, the trial will take its own time, this Court is inclined to give benefit of Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. to

the present applicant.

9. Accordingly, the present bail application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C., is allowed.

10. It is directed that if the applicant furnishes one solvent surety for a sum of Rs.20,000/- along with a personal bond in the like sum to the

satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court with the condition that he will appear before the Trial Court at 11:00 am as and when directed till trial and he

would cooperate during the trial, he shall be released on bail.

11. Certified copy as per rules.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Seeks Legal Power for Drug Marketing Code, Flags Growing Problem of Freebies to Doctors
Nov
21
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Seeks Legal Power for Drug Marketing Code, Flags Growing Problem of Freebies to Doctors
Read More
Supreme Court Rules That Assigning a Specific Performance Decree Does Not Need Registration
Nov
21
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Rules That Assigning a Specific Performance Decree Does Not Need Registration
Read More