Kokilkanth Sahu @ Kokil Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court 26 Jul 2018 Miscellaneous Criminal Case (MCRC) No. 1412 Of 2018 (2018) 07 CHH CK 0318
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Miscellaneous Criminal Case (MCRC) No. 1412 Of 2018

Hon'ble Bench

Arvind Singh Chandel, J

Advocates

Shivendu Pandya, Neeraj Sharma

Final Decision

Allowed

Judgement Text

Translate:

Arvind Singh Chandel, J

1. Heard.

2. It is submitted on behalf of the Applicant that the words ""to the satisfaction of the concerned Juvenile Justice Board for his appearance before the

Board as and when directed by the said Board"" mentioned in paragraph 8 of the order dated 4.7.2018 passed by this Court in Criminal Revision No.95

of 2018 need to be substituted by the words ""to the satisfaction of the 7 th Additional Sessions Judge, Raipur, District Raipur for his appearance before

the said Court as and when directed"" because earlier the matter was pending before the Juvenile Justice Board, but, later on, it was transferred to the

7th Additional Sessions Judge, Raipur. In the circumstance, since the sureties for release of the Applicant on bail cannot be furnished before the

Juvenile Justice Board, the substitution of the words as sought in paragraph 8 of the order dated 4.7.2018 may be allowed for furnishing the sureties

and release of the Applicant on bail.

3. On due consideration, it is directed that in paragraph 8 of the order dated 4.7.2018 passed in Criminal Revision No.95 of 2018, in place of the words

to the satisfaction of the concerned Juvenile Justice Board for his appearance before the Board as and when directed by the said Board"" the words

to the satisfaction of the 7 th Additional Sessions Judge, Raipur, District Raipur for his appearance before the said Court as and when directed"" be

read.

4. Accordingly, the instant Cr.M.P. is allowed. Necessary sureties for release of the Applicant on bail be furnished accordingly before the 7th

Additional Sessions Judge, Raipur, District Raipur.

From The Blog
Calcutta High Court Quashes EPFO Order Denying Higher Pension to SAIL Staff, Calls It ‘Abuse of Law’
Nov
21
2025

Court News

Calcutta High Court Quashes EPFO Order Denying Higher Pension to SAIL Staff, Calls It ‘Abuse of Law’
Read More
Supreme Court Rejects Quota for Civil Judges in District Judge Promotions, Issues Fresh Rules on Seniority
Nov
21
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Rejects Quota for Civil Judges in District Judge Promotions, Issues Fresh Rules on Seniority
Read More