Sandeep Joshi Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court 25 Jun 2018 Miscellaneous Criminal Case (MCRC) No. 3397 Of 2018 (2018) 06 CHH CK 0126
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Miscellaneous Criminal Case (MCRC) No. 3397 Of 2018

Hon'ble Bench

P. Sam Koshy, J

Advocates

BL Sahu, Mazid Ali

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 363, 366, 376
  • Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 161, 164
  • Protection Of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - Section 4, 6

Judgement Text

Translate:

P. Sam Koshy, J

1. This is the first bail application seeking for grant of bail to the Applicant who is in jail since 22.02.2018 in connection with Crime No. 62 of 2018

registered at Police Station Newra, Distt. Raipur, for the offence punishable under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and under Sections 4 & 6 of POCSO

Act.

2. As per prosecution case, the applicant is said to have abducted the prosecutrix, a minor girl, and have kept her in confinement without consent of

her parents and have had physical relationship with the prosecutrix for a considerable period of time and it is only after FIR lodged by the mother and

on subsequent investigation, the prosecutrix could be recovered. It is a case where the prosecutrix is said to have gone along with the applicant on

04.02.2018 and she remained with the applicant till 22.02.2018 when she was ultimately recovered.

3. Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that a plain reading of the statement of the prosecutrix under Section 161 so also under Section 164

CrPC would reveal that there is a clear case of consent given by the prosecutrix and that she voluntarily eloped along with the applicant as they were

having love affair since long. Thus, prayed that the present applicant be released on bail.

4. The State counsel opposing the application submits that the prosecutrix was a minor on the date of incident and irrespective of whether she is a

consenting party, the fact that she is a minor would dis-entitle him from any bail.

5. Without commenting on merits, considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case particularly taking note of the statement of the

prosecutrix wherein she has categorically stated of having voluntarily gone along with the applicant and stayed with him for a considerable period of

time, and further from her statement there does not appear to be any coercion or false assurance put by the applicant, this Court is of the opinion that

the present is a fit case where the Applicant can be enlarged on bail.

6. Accordingly, the application for grant of bail is allowed. It is directed that the Applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond

for a sum of Rs.20,000/- with one surety of the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court for his appearance as and when directed.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More