Sushant Basak Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court 15 May 2018 Miscellaneous Criminal Case (MCRC) No. 5795 Of 2017 (2018) 05 CHH CK 0133
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Miscellaneous Criminal Case (MCRC) No. 5795 Of 2017

Hon'ble Bench

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J

Advocates

Arun Kochar, R.N. Pushty

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 34, 120B, 306, 420, 467, 468, 471
  • Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 439

Judgement Text

Translate:

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J

1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail to the applicant who have

been arrested in connection with Crime No.1083/2014 registered at Police Station Supela, Out Post Vaishali Nagar, District Durg (C.G.) for the

offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on account of abetment and abduction by the present applicant along with other co-accused, Manish Jaiswal

and Sandhya Jaiswal with their son committed suicide in the intervening night of 24th & 25th of December, 2014 and thereby the applicant committed

the aforesaid offence.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the applicant is in jail since 06-09-2015 and the charge-sheet against the applicant under

Section 306 of the IPC has already been quashed and his case is identical to that of the co-accused Niteen Sorya @ Raj who has been granted bail by

this court passed in M.Cr.C. No.1790 of 2018 on 02-04-2018, charge-sheet has already been filed, therefore, the applicant may be released on regular

bail.

4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State would oppose the bail application.

5. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the case diary.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, further taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offence, role of the

applicant, case of the applicant is identical to that of co-accused Niteen Sorya @ Raj who has been similarly situated has been released on bail by

order 02-04-2014, passed in M.Cr.C. No.1790 of 2018, material available on record, looking to the pre-trial detention and the charge-sheet has been

filed, this Court is of the opinion that present is a fit case in which the applicant should be enlarged on regular bail.

7. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. is allowed. It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his

furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court for his appearance

as and when directed.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More