Akash @ Raja Das Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court 25 May 2018 Miscellaneous Criminal Case (MCRC) No. 2872 Of 2018 (2018) 05 CHH CK 0208
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Miscellaneous Criminal Case (MCRC) No. 2872 Of 2018

Hon'ble Bench

P. Sam Koshy, J

Advocates

Awadh Tripathi, Satish Gupta

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred
  • Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 439
  • Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 20B

Judgement Text

Translate:

1. Heard.

2. This is an application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the applicant, who has been arrested in

connection with Crime No.269/2017 registered at Police Station City Kotwali, Dhamtari (CG) for the offence punishable under Section 20(B) of the

NDPS Act.

3. The allegation against the present applicant is that the applicant and other co-accused persons were said to have been transporting 209.100 Kgs of

Ganja on 28.7.2017 in an Innova Car, which was seized by the prosecution.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that if the entire case of the prosecution is read as it is, it would reveal that there were only two

accused persons, who had fled away from the scene of occurrence. He would further submit that the applicant has been impleaded only on the basis

of memorandum statement of a co-accused Anil Gadewal. He would also submit that except the memorandum statement of Anil Gadewal, there is no

material with the prosecution to implicate the present applicant and therefore, he prays for releasing the present applicant on bail.

5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application by pointing out the quantity of contraband and also referring to the

memorandum statement of Anil Gadewal, on the basis of which, the present applicant was arrested.

6. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case particularly taking note of the fact that except for the memorandum statement of co-

accused Anil Gadewal and further no seizure has been made from the present applicant, what is reflected in the FIR or in the Dehatinalisi is that only

2 persons were in the vehicle and who have also been identified in the course of investigation, this Court is thus of the opinion that present is a strong

case to release the present applicant on regular bail.

7. Accordingly, the application is allowed and the applicant is directed to be released on bail on his executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/-

with one surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. He is directed to appear before the trial Court on each and every date given

by the said Court.

8. Certified copy as per rules.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More