Ripusudan Verma Vs Collector, District Baloda Bazar

Chhattisgarh High Court 2 Feb 2018 Writ Petition (C) No. 287 Of 2018 (2018) 02 CHH CK 0080
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition (C) No. 287 Of 2018

Hon'ble Bench

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J

Advocates

Malay Kumar Bhaduri, Dilman Rathi

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Judgement Text

Translate:

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J

1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner would submit that petitioner has made a representation on 15.05.2017 before the Collector,

District Baloda Bazar for redressal of his grievance which is still pending consideration and has not been decided till date, therefore, directions may be

issued to respondent authority to consider and decide the same expeditiously.

2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. The prayer appears to be fair and reasonable.

4. Be that as it may, the Collector, Baloda Bazar is directed to consider petitioner's representation and dispose of the same expeditiously preferably

within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The petitioner would also be at liberty to file additional representation, if

any.

5. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

From The Blog
Supreme Court Clarifies Section 27 Evidence Act: Only “Fact Discovered” Admissible, Not Entire Statement
Nov
19
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Clarifies Section 27 Evidence Act: Only “Fact Discovered” Admissible, Not Entire Statement
Read More
Bar Council of India Defends Rules Allowing Foreign Law Firms in Delhi High Court
Nov
19
2025

Court News

Bar Council of India Defends Rules Allowing Foreign Law Firms in Delhi High Court
Read More