Anita Sahu Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court 5 Feb 2018 Writ Petition (C) No. 3129 Of 2017 (2018) 02 CHH CK 0097
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition (C) No. 3129 Of 2017

Hon'ble Bench

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J

Advocates

Akhilesh Kumar, Dilman Rati Minj

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Judgement Text

Translate:

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J

1. Heard.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner's application for diversion has not been decided till now. Her application was filed on

22-12-2014.

3. Learned State counsel, on instructions, submits that the petitioner's application has already been rejected on 9-3-2015 and subsequently also, on

complaint being made it has been recorded that her application has already been rejected on 9-3-2015.

4. In view of the above, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the order dated 9-3-2015 in accordance with law. A copy of this order be served to

counsel for the petitioner, so that he may proceed in accordance with law.

5. With this observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to costs.

From The Blog
Future of Law in India 2025: Why AI & Technology Skills Are Essential for Young Lawyers
Dec
24
2025

Court News

Future of Law in India 2025: Why AI & Technology Skills Are Essential for Young Lawyers
Read More
Bombay High Court Quashes ₹1,737.2 Crore Arbitral Award Against Thermax
Dec
24
2025

Court News

Bombay High Court Quashes ₹1,737.2 Crore Arbitral Award Against Thermax
Read More