Vinod Kumar Lalwani Vs Union Bank Of India Durg And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court 15 Feb 2018 Writ Petition (C) No. 408 Of 2018 (2018) 02 CHH CK 0266
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition (C) No. 408 Of 2018

Hon'ble Bench

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J

Advocates

Dharmesh Shrivastava, R. N. Pusty

Final Decision

Dismissed

Acts Referred
  • Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Order 22 Rule 4

Judgement Text

Translate:

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J

1. By order dated 15.01.2018, the District Magistrate, Durg in a proceeding initiated under the SARFAESI Act, 2002 allowed the application filed by

the applicant (respondent No.1 herein) under Order 22 Rule 4 of the CPC and allowed the legal heirs of deceased Shri Ashok Kumar Lalwani to be

brought on record, being aggrieved against which this writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner would submit that the impugned order is unsustainable and bad in law and is liable to be set aside.

3. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and gone through the records with utmost circumspection.

4. On careful perusal, I do not find any legal error in the order passed by the District Magistrate, Durg for bringing the Legal Heirs of the deceased on

record.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition deserves to be and is hereby dismissed. No order as to cost(s).

From The Blog
Supreme Court Orders CBI Probe into DLF’s Gurugram Primus Garden City Project After Homebuyers Raise Grievances
Mar
01
2026

Court News

Supreme Court Orders CBI Probe into DLF’s Gurugram Primus Garden City Project After Homebuyers Raise Grievances
Read More
Bombay High Court Orders ₹50 Lakh Compensation to Widow of MSRTC Employee Who Died of COVID-19
Mar
01
2026

Court News

Bombay High Court Orders ₹50 Lakh Compensation to Widow of MSRTC Employee Who Died of COVID-19
Read More