Dukhimoni Dasi Vs Tulsi Charan

Calcutta High Court 24 Nov 1911 (1911) 11 CAL CK 0001
Bench: Division Bench
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Hon'ble Bench

Lawrence Jenkins, C.J; N. Chatterjea, J

Acts Referred
  • Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 116

Judgement Text

Translate:

Lawrence Jenkins, C.J.@mdashHaving regard to Section 116 of the Evidence Act the defendant cannot be permitted to deny that the plaintiff had a title to the possession of the land at a time when the license was given to enter into possession. In the circumstances a suit for use and occupation would lie. There is no question as to the amount due on that basis; it is Rs. 40 and there will be a decree for that amount with costs. The plaintiff will have the costs of the Rule which is made absolute. We assess the hearing fee at one gold mohur.

From The Blog
Allahabad High Court Quashes Lucknow Residency Rule for E-Rickshaw Registration, Calls It Arbitrary and Unconstitutional
Dec
01
2025

Court News

Allahabad High Court Quashes Lucknow Residency Rule for E-Rickshaw Registration, Calls It Arbitrary and Unconstitutional
Read More
NRI Property Buying in India: Legal Rules, Tax Challenges, and Sale Issues Explained
Dec
01
2025

Court News

NRI Property Buying in India: Legal Rules, Tax Challenges, and Sale Issues Explained
Read More