Dukhimoni Dasi Vs Tulsi Charan

Calcutta High Court 24 Nov 1911 (1911) 11 CAL CK 0001
Bench: Division Bench
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Hon'ble Bench

Lawrence Jenkins, C.J; N. Chatterjea, J

Acts Referred
  • Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 116

Judgement Text

Translate:

Lawrence Jenkins, C.J.@mdashHaving regard to Section 116 of the Evidence Act the defendant cannot be permitted to deny that the plaintiff had a title to the possession of the land at a time when the license was given to enter into possession. In the circumstances a suit for use and occupation would lie. There is no question as to the amount due on that basis; it is Rs. 40 and there will be a decree for that amount with costs. The plaintiff will have the costs of the Rule which is made absolute. We assess the hearing fee at one gold mohur.

From The Blog
Supreme Court: Hindu Widow Daughter-in-Law Entitled to Maintenance from Father-in-Law’s Estate
Jan
15
2026

Court News

Supreme Court: Hindu Widow Daughter-in-Law Entitled to Maintenance from Father-in-Law’s Estate
Read More
MP High Court: Aadhaar and Voter ID Not Proof of Age in Service Records
Jan
15
2026

Court News

MP High Court: Aadhaar and Voter ID Not Proof of Age in Service Records
Read More